| The “C” Word: A Critique of Michael Moore’s New Film |
| Written by Nick G. | |
| Tuesday, 24 November 2009 | |
|
By
NICK G.
With
the state of the world economy in turmoil, the “C” word has been coming up in
the public dialogue with greater and greater frequency. Filmmaker, Michael
Moore has made the “C” word — capitalism — the subject of his latest motion
picture. I recently had the opportunity to view Moore’s new film, “Capitalism:
A Love Story” and it has left me, I must admit, a little divided.
For the most part, the film goes along
in much the standard formula of his past films such as “Bowling for Columbine”
and “Sicko”: Snippets of old vintage newsreel combined with Moore’s soothing,
voice-over narratives interspersed by personal confrontations with CEOs and security
guards. But in this film there was something different from his previous
efforts. Something to me that highlighted the times we are living in. It was
the scenes of working class resistance and struggle.
This,
I feel makes the film very human and able to reach the average person on a very
basic level. Two scenes that stood out most profoundly were the scenes
featuring foreclosure protests and last winter’s worker occupation of Republic
Window and Door Factory in Chicago. Scenes like these conjure up the memory of
workers’ struggles of the 1930s and ’40s, such as, the great sit-down strike in
Flint and the Teamsters’ strikes in Minneapolis. These scenes serve as
brilliant examples of what ordinary working class people can do when they band
together and organize.
While
Moore proves to us instance after instance that capitalism is an utterly failed
system, he fails to come to any firm conclusion. At one point he suggests that
perhaps it is just plain greed and a lack of Christian principles that has led
to the economic crisis. He also points to a lack of democracy and worker
ownership over our economy and means of production. While most of these things
are good, they do not lead us to any concrete solution. Moore denounces
capitalism throughout the picture, but it’s almost as if he is afraid to come
out and say the “S” word — socialism, which has left me with mixed feelings
about the film.
At a recent AFL-CIO
convention, Michael Moore called for a march on Washington in favor of
single-payer healthcare. However, he still sees the Democratic Party as a
vehicle for change and seems to still be under the illusion that somehow the
Democratic Party, a party of capitalism, is still reformable.
As stated in his
October 22 article, “15 Things Every American Can Do Right Now,” he believes
that by supporting more left-of-center, “progressive” candidates in Democratic
primaries as a challenge to centrist and “blue dog” Democrats the working class
will get what it needs. This theory has been tested time and time again, yielding
no return.
A real and effective
solution would be for the working class to organize its own party of labor,
independent of the two major parties and to support independent candidates that
fight for a true working class agenda.
It’s
true that Moore has brought the debate where it should be, focused squarely on
the absolute failure of the capitalist system. Unfortunately, he comes short.
He takes the case he has made and seemingly abandons it just when it needs to
be driven toward discussion of an alternative or any real solution. Nonetheless, I feel that this film can be a useful organizing tool and possibly bring back some class consciousness, something that has been missing for too long. |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|