| What Next After September 24? |
| Written by Editorial -- The Organizer | |
| Sunday, 04 October 2009 | |
What Next After September 24?
The September 24 University
of California walkout to save public education — the biggest coordinated
protest in UC history — could be a historic turning point not just for
California, but for the country as a whole.
Over 5,000 students,
workers, and faculty paralyzed UC Berkeley — other UC campuses held inspired
walkouts and rallies with close to a thousand participants each, an impressive
feat given that the 24th was the first day of class for these
schools. Excitement filled the air. A new movement was born — with momentum to
spare.
But this is only the
beginning of the struggle. And in order to move forward, it is first necessary
to draw some lessons from what was learned on this historic day, particularly
at UC Berkeley.
Lesson One: Masses of People Are Ready to
Struggle
Nobody expected to see such
huge numbers turn out. For many years, the cuts, fee hikes, and layoffs have
been getting worse and worse, with very little resistance on campuses. The
media and politicians cynically proclaimed the “death of campus activism.”
But appearances can be
deceiving — anger has been building up under the surface and it exploded onto
the streets on 9/24. People finally said, “Enough is Enough!” Overnight, the
situation has been transformed. Now it is necessary to channel this energy and
momentum into an organized mass movement capable of winning this historic
struggle — and inspiring other sectors to fight back and win.
Lesson Two: Unity is Key
The power of the protests
stemmed from the unprecedented unity forged between students, workers, and
faculty against the UC administration and against the politicians in
Sacramento. Teachers brought their classes to the rally; students stood on the
picket line; workers denounced the tuition hikes.
If this struggle is to
succeed, the movement will have to broaden from the UC to the CSUs, CCs, and
K-12. This is the importance of the Statewide Mobilizing Conference that will
take place on October 24 in Berkeley. Likewise, activists must be prepared for
the attempts by the state to pit the UC (which has sufficient reserve funds to
immediately stop the cuts) against other educational sectors; just as they will
seek to pit some unions against other unions, workers against students, etc.
“United we stand, divided we fall.”
Lesson Three: Mass Action Works
Progressive change happens
when masses of people mobilize and organize independently for their demands.
Indeed, the 9/24 protests did more to advance the struggle to save public
education than years and years of letter writing and lobbying. Many previously
apolitical students began as passive observers of the rally — but by the end of
the day they were participating in a mass sit-in at the intersection of
Bancroft and Telegraph and chanting at the top of their lungs “Whose
University? Our University!” Students and workers got a sense of their real
power as the cops and administrators could literally do nothing to break up the
sea of protestors.
In the face of this rally
and tons of bad publicity in the media, the UC bureaucrats were put on the
defensive. (Chancellor Birgeneau’s post-walkout press release sought to save
face by — falsely — claiming that the protest was solely directed at
Sacramento, while in reality one of the most popular chants was “Lay off (UC
President) Yudof!”)
Lesson Four: Liberalism and Ultraleftism
are Dead Ends
Clearly, mass action works
and needs to be deepened — yet there are already forces trying to push the
movement in a different direction. The liberals and administrators are (yet
again) pushing for more letter-writing and lobbying. Gubernatorial candidate
Gavin Newsome came out in support of the walkout, cynically aiming to channel
this energy into the Democratic Party.
But the Democrats are just
as responsible as the Republicans for the cuts, as Professor Mike Davis
recently noted: “Here you have the governor and his gang of Republicans, and
they're holding the people captive and threatening to shoot them one by one
unless their demands for budget cuts and a new stage of Republican fiscal
revolution occurs. And on the other hand, you have the leadership of the
Democratic Party in Sacramento saying, ‘Oh no, don't shoot all the passengers,
just shoot half the passengers.’”
On the other hand, some
impatient ultra-left students are already arguing that the movement has to move
on to “more militant tactics” such as occupations (by small groups of
radicals). While the tactic of a mass occupation could be useful in the future,
minority “direct actions” at this early point are at best a distraction and, at
worst, a pretext for the administrators and police to repress the movement and
scare people off from getting involved.
The bizarre politics of the
ultra-left forces was best summed up by the following statement that came out
of the UCSC occupation: “We do not seek structural reforms. We demand not a
free university but a free society. A free university in the midst of a
capitalist society is like a reading room in a prison.” But all activists with
at least one foot in reality know that the path to a “free society” passes
through building a grassroots resistance movement today to defend public
education.
Lesson Five: A Mass Democratic Movement is
Needed
The most important political
development at UC Berkeley is the creation of a space for students, workers,
and faculty to democratically and directly control their movement: the mass
General Assemblies. At these huge open meetings every person has the right to
vote and voice, enabling unity to be forged between different sectors and
allowing more and more individuals to be drawn into the movement. Proposals for
how to move the struggle forward are debated passionately and openly — and
then voted on.
It is crucial that other
campuses organize General Assemblies ASAP — and that the General Assembly
process at UCB be defended against the attacks of the ultra-lefts (who
effectively broke up the end of the 9/24 assembly by trying to impose an
occupation on it without allowing for a vote by the body) and against the
forces tied to the administration, who will do everything to sabotage this
emerging power of direct democracy, which challenges the legitimacy of our
supposed representatives in the administration and state government.
What Next?
The crucial next step is to
build and ensure the success of the October 24th Mobilizing
Conference at UC Berkeley. As the
call for the conference states, “We have the power to stop the catastrophic
budget cuts, fee hikes, and layoffs — but to save public education in
California requires coordinating our actions on a state-wide level.”
Socialist Organizer believes
the October 24th Conference should call for a education strike in
the Spring because, as we put in the flier S.O. distributed by the thousands on
9.24:
“Nothing
short of a state-wide strike and walkout of students, workers, and faculty at
all UC’s, CSU’s, and Community Colleges, will be enough to force the corrupt
bureaucrats and corporate politicians to retreat from their drive to destroy
public education. No university can function without the teachers, students,
and workers. We make these institutions run — and we can shut them down until
our just demands are met. Organizing such a strike will not be easy — but it is
necessary.
Our message is simple: No Cuts or Fee Hikes!
Education is a Human Right! We demand quality education not just for the
wealthy and privileged, but for working-class students, students of color, and
AB540 students, who are the first to be affected by these budget cuts. The
money exists to save education: the “budget crisis” is, in reality, a
priorities crisis of the powers-that-be in this state.
There
are many alternatives to the cuts: UC Regent and CSU Trustee executive salaries
could be slashed immediately; new building construction and other non-essential
projects could be put on hold; reserve funds could be used; the rich could be
taxed their fair share; Obama’s bailout money and/or war spending could go to
saving state services; Proposition 13 could be reformed; oil corporations could
be taxed for oil drilling; prison funding could be reallocated to schools;
etc.”
We encourage all students
and workers who agree with this perspective to contact us to join Socialist
Organizer in pushing forward this historic struggle.
|
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|